Wednesday, 6 November 2024

First units for the Sudan

 I've decided to start this project with the Beja contingent which is now half, more or less, finished. I painted the figures using enamels.

So far I've done four of the seven spear/sword units, two of the four riflemen units and three of the four command command stands. There will also be a unit of camel riders and two 'captured' Krupp pieces. All figures are Perry Miniatures

When deciding to do the Beja I took a fantastic piece of advice from Kevin Calder and completely ignored his other piece of advice. 

I decided to copy his round base idea. Round bases are a very simple way of losing the regimented look of 'irregular units' when they are based on rectangular/square bases. The way they can be bunched together any old how is transformative. All of my irregular infantry units will be based on 50mm diameter bases (from Warbases).

I ignored his advice about picking a Sudan sub-period campaign. Sometime between the 1st and 2nd Suakin campaigns, the Mahdi prescribed an edict that all of his followers should shave their heads, wear a skull cap and sandals and, where practicable/available, don a patched jibbeh. In effect, from 1885 all early period Mahdist Ansar looked, more or less, the same. I've decided that my Mahdi will never issue such a decree - this will give my Mahdists an imagi-jihad feel but frankly, for the variation in unit look, I'm happy to go against history: I will have 'Fuzzy Wuzzy' Beja with 'ayrick 'air for the entire period and I will be able to do Kippling, in bad 'Michael Caine':

So 'ere's to you Fuzzy Wuzzy, at your 'ome in the Soudan;
You're a pore benighted 'eathen but a first class fighting man;

An 'ere's to you Fuzzy Wuzzy, with your 'ayrick 'ead of 'air -
You big black boundin' beggar - for you broke the British square.


My first three command stands with Osman Digna (centre) flanked by two other command stands; the mounted figure on the right has had a Beja head swap (originally bald in skull cap). Initially I had thought to do single mounted figure 'brigade level' command stands but, somehow one stand on a base hasn't done it for me for quite some time.

My sword and spear units will all be based around an average standard of six bases (50mm diameter). 

Initially I thought to put six figures on a base but discovered that a mix of six and five figure bases (three of each) actually increased the irregular look - six figures only really fit on a stand one way, especially when mixing metal and plastic figures.

Each base will represent about 100 men.


Each base has three metal figures and either two or three plastic figures.

I have a feeling that the plastic spears will prove to be fragile. In consequence, I have decided to place at least one metal figure on each flank of a base to protect them when handled.
I'm sticking to three basic colours for the clothing: White, dirty orange and tan. The tan will have a natural variation because I'm purposefully not noting the precise paint mix for each batch.
Flags are downloads that have been over-painted. They are slightly oversized for effect (and ease of painting).
Riflemen are based three to a stand (representing 50 men per stand). Fifteen of the eighteen men in a unit are metal, the other three are plastic.
I'm going to continue painting the Beja until they are done (six more units and two pieces of artillery). Then, I'll move onto do half of the British force before moving onto the Kordofan contingent (which is about the same size as the Beja with a few more cavalry).

This is never going to be a huge collection - I'm thinking one session games - but, if it plays well, I'll do an Egyptian army, the Camel Corps and add another half a dozen or so Mahdist units - especially more cavalry/camelry. 


11 comments:

Brent said...

Looking great!

Colin Ashton said...

Gorgeous

Duke of Baylen said...

These look really good. I was intrigued that you painted with enamels. The round bases do have the effect you wanted and the placing of the plastic figures protected by the metal is a useful tip too. The big hair is a much more evocative look than the alternative whatever the Mahdi said.
Stephen

Rob said...

Lovely figures, and I do like the idea of not using rectangular bases, but think I would go for something that packs better than circles - need to play around with some ideas. Also, in favour of your aesthetic choice to mix up the Mahdist dress a bit - allows big hair and patched jibbehs (not on the same troops) which are the two most attractive elements.
The best source for uniforms / dress (and history) IMO is Mike Snook's 'Go Strong into the Desert' well worth the price as is his 'Beyond the Reach of Empire'.
What rules are you planning to use? I'm currently doing some prortotyping to see if I can do the 'The Sands of the Sudan' in 20mm.

JAMES ROACH said...

Agreed on Snook's book. The painting guide on the Perry site will also be invaluable for the British. My library for this period is growing (about 15 books including the Osprey titles) and I've added Fuzzy Wuzzy by Robson to my Christmas list; however, I am finding it hard to find books which say something new - how many 'general histories' does a person need.

I have Sands of the Sudan (they were kindly given to me by a client, thanks Jason W.) and they look interesting. With good scenarios they could well prove to be great fun but, I fear without a scenario they might be just as dreadful. My units will be different sizes to those prescribed - I think they do 10 men per figure and I'm doing 15 men per figure - so new combat tables might need to be formulated.

Initially, I'm going to try Black Powder and Piquet. The former will be useful for thrown together games, whilst building the forces, to get a feel for game balance. A Piquet derivative will probably be the end result but, whatever else, they will both need a mechanism to enable a unit to split its fire (as written, neither can). This latter point is essential because some British units will invariably end up forming the corner of a brigade square/rectangle - effectively, with half a unit facing at 90 degrees to the other half - because a two or three unit brigade can't form a brigade square otherwise, and I want my brigade organisation to be fairly historical. My smallest British battalions will be 36 figures on six 50mm square bases (600 men) and the bigger ones will be 48 figures on eight square bases (800 men) - so they will be big enough to do this.

There are also Up the Nile, by Kevin Calder. I've played his rules before (for other periods with The League of Gentlemen Wargamers) and they are pretty elegant and pretty good fun. They are centred around 4 stand units, and I'm not going that route for this period, but are probably adaptable.

Anyway, these are early thoughts on rules. We shall see.

JAMES ROACH said...

Base shape. I did toy with the idea of hexes, 50mm across flats, but I went with circular bases because I thought the surface area was probably more (I didn't actually work it out, it was a guess).

rct75001 said...

They look wonderful James. The idea of round bases is also a very good look.
Richard

David said...

A fine start to your project there!

Rob said...

Hexes 50mm across the flats will be larger (surface area) than 50mm diameter circles but not by much - the circle will fit exactly within the footprint of the hexes with just the hex corners slightly projecting. I must admit I wasn't thinking of hexes, more like octagons (effectively squares with corners trimmed off). Looking forward to the next post, but what happened to the Nap campaign?

JAMES ROACH said...

The Napoleonic campaign ended when Peter J. (playing Spanish) was diagnosed with terminal cancer. He wanted to play as many different types of game as he was able so we ended the campaign early. Sadly, he died in June.

Steve-the-Wargamer said...

Those are lovely...